Big Bang and Time

Good morning, dear brother. Since I couldn't sleep through all the things happening during the night, I decided to make good use of my time and explain a little more about White Hole and Gravitational Time Dilation. Albert Einsten, Ph.D. in Physics, said that time can slow down at different places in the universe based upon space warping due to massive gravitational objects. This can be found succintly put in this astronomy website:http://woodside.blogs.com/cosmologycuriosity/2006/06/gravitational_t.htmlNo one had any serious problems with it. Then Stephen Hawkings, Ph.D. in Physics, built upon Einstein and stated that time can slow down at different places in the universe in what he called a gravity well ("the lower [in a gravity well] the slower")http://woodside.blogs.com/cosmologycuriosity/2006/06/hawkings_astron.htmlAgain, no one had any serious problems with it. Then experiments with atomic clocks at sea level, mile high Colorado, and in high altitude airplanes showed a successive but minute difference in time aging to demonstrate experimentally that what Hawkings said is true. But then when a Christian who has a Ph.D. in Physics used what the secular scientific community has used to explain away the time paradox of Creation and apparent ages, then atheists had problems with it because they didn't want Christians to have a reasonable explanation. This is intellectual hypocrisy (i.e., "it's scientific for me, but unscientific for you"). EXPLANATION: When D. Russell Humphreys explained how Einstein and Hawkings show how the earth can be literally only a few thousand years old while at the same time starlight, the 4K background radiation, etc. does show that the universe can indeed be billions of years old. How can this be? Humphreys said that Einstein and Hawkings make possible the use of two different clocks, one within the event horizon (until it was eclipsed by the shrinking and then disappearing White Hole [shrinking because it's ejecting all the known physical matter and energy and even time out into the known universe in order to create everything at the Big Bang, which was what led to the emptying of the White Hole] and one outside the event horizon, namely the rest of the universe out to its edge or 4K background radiation that was ejected after the Big Bang. Due to super gravitational well, time inside the event horizon (i.e., Earth) would be aging very slowly--in the thousands of years at the Creation, Big Bang, or Genesis--while time outside the event horizon would be aging super "fast" (now known as "normal" time because we now live in this part of the universe). The problem is that Humphreys (this first camp includes most ICR scientists) try to use this mainstream idea to argue that there was not a Big Bang but that was unnecessary since many other Christian physicists (a second camp) said that this basically sound argument can be used with the Big Bang as God's moment of Creation. I'm with this second camp. I believe God could've used the Big Bang to create and that the universe can indeed be billions of years old, and yet, measured from the Earth, God did do it all in 6 literal days! P.S. You can post this on your blog if you wish!